🔗 Share this article

In my role as a Dungeon Master, I traditionally avoided heavy use of randomization during my D&D adventures. I tended was for story direction and session development to be shaped by character actions as opposed to the roll of a die. That said, I opted to try something different, and I'm very pleased with the outcome.

The Catalyst: Watching a Custom Mechanic

An influential actual-play show features a DM who regularly requests "luck rolls" from the participants. This involves selecting a specific dice and defining potential outcomes contingent on the number. It's essentially no unlike consulting a pre-generated chart, these are devised spontaneously when a player's action lacks a clear resolution.

I opted to test this technique at my own game, primarily because it looked engaging and presented a departure from my standard routine. The experience were remarkable, prompting me to reconsider the ongoing tension between pre-determination and improvisation in a tabletop session.

An Emotional Story Beat

In a recent session, my group had just emerged from a large-scale battle. Later, a cleric character asked about two beloved NPCs—a brother and sister—had made it. Rather than picking a fate, I handed it over to chance. I instructed the player to roll a d20. I defined the outcomes as: on a 1-4, both were killed; on a 5-9, a single one succumbed; a high roll, they made it.

Fate decreed a 4. This led to a deeply moving scene where the characters found the corpses of their companions, forever united in their final moments. The cleric performed last rites, which was especially significant due to earlier story developments. As a parting gesture, I improvised that the forms were miraculously transformed, revealing a enchanted item. I randomized, the item's contained spell was perfectly what the group required to address another major quest obstacle. It's impossible to orchestrate such magical story beats.

Improving On-the-Spot Skills

This event led me to ponder if improvisation and making it up are in fact the essence of D&D. Even if you are a detail-oriented DM, your improvisation muscles may atrophy. Groups reliably find joy in derailing the most carefully laid plans. Therefore, a skilled DM must be able to pivot effectively and invent details in real-time.

Employing on-the-spot randomization is a fantastic way to train these talents without straying too much outside your preparation. The strategy is to deploy them for minor circumstances that have a limited impact on the campaign's main plot. To illustrate, I would avoid using it to establish if the central plot figure is a secret enemy. But, I would consider using it to determine whether the characters arrive moments before a major incident occurs.

Strengthening Collaborative Storytelling

This technique also serves to maintain tension and foster the feeling that the game world is dynamic, evolving based on their actions as they play. It reduces the perception that they are merely actors in a rigidly planned script, thereby strengthening the collaborative foundation of roleplaying.

This philosophy has long been embedded in the core of D&D. Original D&D were filled with random tables, which suited a playstyle focused on exploration. While contemporary D&D tends to emphasizes narrative and role-play, leading many DMs to feel they must prep extensively, this isn't always the required method.

Finding the Healthy Equilibrium

There is absolutely no issue with thorough preparation. Yet, equally valid nothing wrong with relinquishing control and allowing the whim of chance to decide some things instead of you. Direction is a major factor in a DM's job. We use it to manage the world, yet we often struggle to give some up, even when doing so can lead to great moments.

My final suggestion is this: Don't be afraid of letting go of control. Try a little improvisation for smaller outcomes. The result could discover that the unexpected outcome is significantly more memorable than anything you might have scripted in advance.